Copying source code: reproducing even a small portion of source code can constitute copyright infringement.

In the case of IPC Global Pty Ltd v Pavetest Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] FCA 82, the Federal Court was given the difficult task of determining what was a ‘substantial part’ of the source code of a piece of software for the purposes of constituting copyright infringement. The case concerned allegations of copyright infringement …
>> Read more

Interlocutory relief for a ‘one trick pony’: clarification around the factors relevant to the court when considering interlocutory injunctions.

In Dincel Construction System Pty Limited v AFS Systems Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 262, the Federal Court granted interlocutory relief to a company with a single product (a so-called ‘one trick pony’) against one of the CSR group of companies. The injunction prevented AFS from marketing or selling its potentially infringing product, pending the outcome …
>> Read more

Lessons from Clipsal’s trade mark battle for the cancellation of CLIPSO

In Clipsal Australia Pty Ltd v Clipso Electrical Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] FCA 60, the Applicant, Clipsal, successfully brought action against Clipso Electrical Pty Ltd for the cancellation of its CLIPSO trade mark registration. Whilst it also succeeded in one of its two trade mark infringement claims and related causes of action, it failed …
>> Read more

‘It’s not me, it’s you.’ Terminating your business relationship.

The case of Peter Vogel Instruments Pty Ltd v Fairlight.Au Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 172 (9 December 2016) highlighted the importance of a written agreement in determining the parties’ rights when a business relationship breaks down. This case involved an agreement for Fairlight to develop software for Peter Vogel (PV) in return for four progress …
>> Read more

US giant, Valve Corporation, fined over $US2 million for its no refund policy

The Law Australia has very strong consumer protection laws, contained in the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). One consumer ‘guarantee’ requires that goods be of ‘acceptable quality’ (for example, fit for purpose, free from defects etc.). This guarantee applies to goods of a kind ‘ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use or consumption’ (consumer goods) …
>> Read more

Booze it or lose it! Register your trade marks responsibly.

The expression ’use it or lose it‘ is often applied to retaining learned skills, but can also apply to retaining rights, particularly rights obtained by trade mark registration. In Australia, owners must use their mark within five years of applying for the mark. Once that five year period expires, any person can apply to remove …
>> Read more

The Australian Productivity Commission releases final report on intellectual property arrangements

The Australian Productivity Commission recently released its final report on their inquiry into Australian intellectual property (IP) arrangements. The Commission’s inquiry adopted a holistic approach considering all of Australia’s IP rights, with the specific intention of identifying ways the IP system could be improved. The final report was publicly released on 20 December 2016 and …
>> Read more

A ‘little’ Greek food for thought

In 3 Florinians Pty Ltd v PYT Enterprise Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1077, the owner of popular Greek restaurant, Little Greek Taverna, obtained an interlocutory injunction to stop two other restaurants from using the word ‘little’ along with the words ‘Greek Cuzina’, pending trial or earlier orders. A little confused? Shouldn’t a trader be able …
>> Read more