In this edition…

• Trade mark registration stacks up for JB Hi-Fi
• Australian Innovation Patents likely to be abolished
• Encompass Corporation v InfoTrack - Our full analysis

In this edition…

• Indigenous art knock-offs result in $2.3 million fine
• Australia not in Harmony with the US on Diagnostic Patents
• Patentable Subject Matter: Second Bite of the Apple® Sweeter than a Cripps Pink®

In this edition…

• Getting the most out of your IP: Questions from start-ups
• Unjustified threats riskier than ever
• POF takes home 'Firm of the Year' award for Trade Mark Prosecution

In this edition…

• The Coca-Cola Company wins green trade mark fight
• Congratulations to our new Partners and Associates
• First of its kind: Injunction restraining launch of biosimilar granted in Australia

In this edition…

• Innovation patents on the ropes, but not the canvas.
• Federal Court smashes Bohemia Crystal monopoly.
• The Carbon XPRIZE and CSIRO: CO2 mitigation technology in Australia and beyond.

In this edition…

• Listed Australian patent attorney firms put on notice to ensure transparency to clients
• Full Court shares ‘Insights’ and casts ‘Harbour Lights’ on trade mark ownership rights
• Reading the fine print: When will refurbished goods infringe a patent?

In this edition…

• Innovation patent system to be abolished: results of the Productivity Commission inquiry
• A (non-physical) Apple spoils the bunch? A potted history of non-physical designs in Australia
• Federal Court casts white LED light on the meaning of ‘contains’

In this edition…

• Lessons from Clipsal’s trade mark battle for the cancellation of CLIPSO
• Copying source code: reproducing even a small portion of source code can constitute copyright infringement.
• Interlocutory relief for a ‘one trick pony’: clarification around the factors relevant to the court when considering interlocutory injunctions.