Beware of trap purchase pitfalls

Evidence of representations made during a trap purchase may be crucial in proving passing off or misleading and deceptive conduct.

Federal Court rekindles patent opposition obviousness

As noted previously, the decision in Austal Ships v Stena regarding the evidentiary onus placed on an opponent has made establishing lack of inventive step as part of a patent opposition very difficult. However, the recent decision in Aspirating IP Limited v Vision Systems Limited [2010] FCA 1061 appears to have breathed new life into …
>> Read more

Whirlpool’s recipe for success

Whirlpool Properties, Inc the company behind the well-known KITCHENAID food mixer has successfully prevented registration of the trade mark KitchenMaid.

Revision of Divisional Practice

IP Australia is currently implementing changes to the way in which it handles divisional patent applications. The intention of the changes is to reduce delays in achieving resolution (acceptance or refusal) of divisional applications.

Luscious Lips Ship Sinks

Nature’s Blend, owner of the trade mark LUSCIOUS LIPS, has failed in its appeal to the Full Federal Court against a finding of non-infringement by Nestlé in Nature’s Blend Pty Ltd v Nestlé Australia Ltd [2010] FCAFC 117.

Forever Young Trade Mark Lives On

In Eurark LLC v Planet Health Pty Limited [2010] ATMO 75 Eurark successfully defended an action by Planet Health for removal of its trade mark FOREVER YOUNG on the basis of nonuse.  The trade mark was registered in respect of “cosmetics, namely cellular moisturizing creams, lotions and gels”.

Latest figures of counterfeit items seizures in the European Union

The European Commission released its latest statistics for goods suspected of infringing intellectual property rights intercepted in 2009 by EU Customs. The most frequently detained articles include cigarettes (19%), labels (13%) and medicines (10%). As in Australia, more and more of the products detained by customs are consumer goods and not just luxury goods like …
>> Read more

Cloudy ownership of rainwater tanks

In Courier Pete Pty Ltd v Metroll Queensland Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 735 Metroll, a rainwater tank manufacturer, was unsuccessful in its claim that it was the person entitled to be registered as the owner of registered designs for new rainwater tanks. The designer and the designs Mr Collymore was the factory foreman of Metroll’s …
>> Read more