Helen McFadzean

Principal
Helen Mcfadzean headshot
People background banner

Helen joined the intellectual property profession in 2009 because of her passion for innovation and cutting-edge technology.

Service Areas

Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick logo wheel webp

Since then, Helen has successfully obtained patents, trade marks and designs for many businesses in Australia and overseas in a large number of technology areas including machine learning and image classification, battery management systems, automation, smart devices, medical apparatus, manufacturing processes and equipment, subsea mining technology, automotive technology, audio signal processing, embedded software, and control systems.

Helen is experienced in drafting patent specifications, prosecuting patent application in Australia and overseas, providing infringement and validity opinions, conducting searches and providing general IP advice. Since joining Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick in 2017, Helen has developed a further specialisation in artificial intelligence and software patents. In 2019, Helen completed AI Programming with Python, a future skills course from Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, where she gained hands on experience building an image classifier using convolutional neural networks, which enabled her to further develop her understanding and appreciation for AI and Machine Learning algorithms.

Before joining the IP profession, Helen worked as a consultant in Ernst & Young’s advisory services, assisting leading global organisations to identify and mitigate business and technology risk.

Clients enjoy working with Helen because she is approachable, informative and upfront with processes and costs. She is also proactive in learning about her clients’ businesses so that the most suitable and cost-effective IP strategy can be developed based on commercial objectives.

Helen is also a Mandarin speaker.

Expertise & Experience

  • Electrical Engineering
  • Electronic Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Civil & Industrial Engineering
  • Physical & Computer Sciences
  • Emerging & Interdisciplinary

Qualifications

  • BE (Hons) Mechatronics MIP FIPTA

More about Helen

Languages I speak

English, Mandarin

Countries lived in

Australia, New Zealand, UK, China

As a child, what did you want to be when you grew up?

Marine biologist

Scariest thing you’ve ever done

Followed by shark whilst snorkelling

My first job was

Movie projectionist

Related news and insights

Insights Photo

Advance in Computer Technology Not Required: A Win for Computer Implemented Inventions in Australia

Three years ago, the High Court’s equal division in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2022] HCA 29 (reported here) left Australia without binding guidance on the patentability of computer implemented inventions.
Helen McFadzean

17 September 2025

Insights Photo

Trustee’s ‘Inherited Financial Circumstances’ Insufficient to Justify Extension of Time Request

In the recent decision of Aqua HD [2025] APO 2, the Delegate denied a request for an extension of time made by a patent applicant’s trustee, who had been appointed by the court to wind down the company following insolvency proceedings.
Helen McFadzean

17 March 2025

Insights Photo

A Cliffhanger with No Sequel Australia’s Apex Court Divided on Patentable Subject Matter

Analyzing Aristocrat v Commissioner of Patents. Why the High Court’s split decision means a “cliffhanger” for Australian software patent eligibility.
Helen McFadzean

19 August 2022

Insights Photo

Full Federal Court says no to AI inventors

In the latest chapter of the DABUS saga, the Full Federal Court of Australia has determined that a device characterized as an artificial intelligence machine cannot be considered to be an ‘inventor’ in Commissioner of Patents v Thaler [2022] FCAFC 62.
Helen McFadzean

14 April 2022

Insights Photo

Another One Bites the Dust – Patent Application Naming AI Machine DABUS as Inventor Refused in New Zealand

Last year, patent applications filed by Dr Stephen Thaler naming an artificial intelligence known as ‘Device for Autonomous Bootstrapping of Unified Sentience‘ (DABUS) as the inventor made news headlines around the world. As reported earlier, in a surprising move the Australian Federal Court recognised DABUS as an inventor. This decision is currently on appeal.
Helen McFadzean

9 February 2022

Insights Photo

What do an AI machine and a monkey have in common? DABUS challenges current legal principles on inventorship

Can AI be an inventor? The DABUS case explores how Australian and international patent law approaches AI inventorship and legal ownership.
Helen McFadzean

12 March 2021

Learn more about what matters to our people

We are a curious and approachable team of professionals, united by a passion for IP and helping your ideas succeed.

Banner image
How can we help you?