Three years ago, the High Court’s equal division in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2022] HCA 29 (reported here) left Australia without binding guidance on the patentability of computer implemented inventions.
Today, the High Court of Australia has dismissed an application for special leave to appeal from Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2025] FCAFC 131.
Our IP lawyers combine deep legal expertise with technical and commercial understanding to help you protect, enforce and maximise the value of your IP assets.
Many of our clients make use of the Australian Designs system to protect the unique appearance of their products.
ChatGPT tackles Australian software patent law—and hallucinates the answers. Discover why the AI still recommends hiring a real patent attorney.
Understanding the Rokt decision: Why software patent success in Australia depends on technical computer implementation rather than clever business ideas.
Our IP professionals understand, protect, help commercialise and defend hardware and software innovations so that our clients can thrive in fast-moving and highly competitive markets.
Quantum technologies are often understood as being synonymous with quantum computing. In a set of recently announced Executive Orders, the United States has sought to accelerate quantum computing, sensing, networking and post-quantum cybersecurity.
A recent Full Federal Court decision has discussed the meaning of the term “staple commercial product” within the context of patent infringement by supply of an essential oil to customers.
Following the Aristocrat split, the Federal Court’s UbiPark v TMA Capital decision provides fresh hope for patenting computer-implemented inventions.
