you are here >

Staff Details - Phillips Ormonde & Fitzpatrick | Intellectual Property Law Firm - Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys - Research and Investigation

Team member profile : Malcolm Bell

 
 
Name: Malcolm Bell
Office Location: Melbourne
Position: Partner
Qualifications: Bachelor of Science (Hons) University of Melbourne, 1987
Bachelor of Laws, University of Melbourne, 1987
Admitted to legal practice, 1987
Master of Laws, University of Melbourne, 1996
Registered Patent Attorney, 1994
Registered Trade Marks Attorney, 1994
Practice Areas:
Direct Telephone: +61 3 9622 2223
Facsimile: +61 3 9614 1867
Email: malcolm.bell@pof.com.au
Profile: During university, Malcolm Bell’s science major was in inorganic chemistry.

Malcolm joined the firm in 1992 and is a Partner of both Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick and Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick Lawyers.

Malcolm has practised in all aspects of patent and trade mark work including drafting patent specifications, prosecuting patent and trade mark applications and providing infringement and validity advice. In addition, Malcolm is an experienced litigator. His patent work has an emphasis on chemical and related fields.

In recent years Malcolm has acted for clients in relation to technologies ranging from simple mechanical devices to the more complex area of pharmaceuticals, polymer chemistry and plant biotechnology. Malcolm has also acted on cases that involve international disputes.

Malcolm is experienced in running opposition matters before both the Patent Office and Trade Marks Office including appearing as an advocate. Malcolm also has extensive experience in trade mark, copyright and trade practices litigation.
Year joined: 1992
Year qualified: 1987
Memberships: Fellow - Institute of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys of Australia
Member - Royal Australian Chemical Institute
Member - Law Institute of Victoria
Member - American Intellectual Property Law Association
   
 
The email address appearing on this page is intended for use by clients or potential clients. Its publication should not be construed by those seeking to generate sales as "conspicuous publication" as defined by the Spam Act 2003 - consent to receiving commercial electronic messages may not be inferred and such commercial emails may therefore be in breach of the Spam Act.