Philips Ormonde Fitzpatrick logo
 
intellectual property    about us   our services   our professionals   news & publications   employment   contact us 
newsletter :: latest newsletter and form :: news :: lab notebook guide :: ip resources     search button
 
news and publications
:: news
small arrow case review - nz opposition by hansen beverage
small arrow case review - opposition by nz post
small arrow change at ipopng
small arrow latest newsletter available
small arrow case review - ranbaxy appeal
small arrow new interactive map
small arrow new ip blog
small arrow top tier results in mip survey copy
small arrow case review - health world v shin-sun australia
small arrow mip global awards
small arrow uspto practice
small arrow case review - review australia v innovative lifestyle investments
small arrow brw triathlon success
small arrow case review - polo/lauren
small arrow po&f rating well in surveys
small arrow key ip treaties - global snapshot
small arrow case review - chiropedic bedding pty ltd v radburg pty ltd
small arrow case review - granting a licence to harvest trees may amount to contributory infringement of a patent
small arrow change to search results requirement
small arrow case review - termite tite v term-seal
small arrow case review - brothervdynamic
small arrow to amend or not to amend; that is the question
small arrow government to provide for experimental use
small arrow vale tony price
small arrow promotions
small arrow next big thing award winner announced
small arrow lockwood wins high court case
small arrow case review - burge v swarbrick
small arrow po&f client, labtech systems ltd, signs worldwide license agreement
small arrow hat trick for po&f in brw st george client choice awards
small arrow top tier results in mip survey
small arrow ip australia fees to change
small arrow new brand for phillips ormonde & fitzpatrick
small arrow physical effect of business methods

 


Change to Search Results requirement - Phillips Ormonde & Fitzpatrick



Need to file search results being discontinued




22 October, 2007



For some years there has been an obligation on applicants for Australian patents to lodge certain official search results with the Patent Office.

On 17 October, 2007, the Patents Amendment Regulations 2007 (No 1) removed that obligation in respect to all future (after 22 October) and many pending applications, as follows:


Search results are no longer required for


  • Applications on which examination was requested on or after 22 April 2007, or
  • Applications which were advertised as accepted for patent grant on or after 22 July 2007, or
  • Applications lodged on or after 22 October 2007

Search results are still required to be lodged where


  • Search results were completed before 22 April 2007, and
  • Examination was requested before 22 April 2007, and
  • The application was advertised as accepted for patent grant before 22 July 2007

Where the continuing obligation applies, it remains necessary to inform the Patent Office of the results of any official search results undertaken to assess the patentability of the invention disclosed in the application.

For patents granted before 22 April 2007, the continuing obligation only extends to search results completed before the date on which the patent was granted.

There are ongoing provisions for late lodgement of search results outside the prescribed time frames.

Non compliance with the obligation may continue to affect the allowance of any amendments proposed to a patent granted on the application.





 
copyright © Phillips Ormonde & Fitzpatrick 2006  I  Privacy Statement  I  Disclaimer  I  Sitemap Melbourne | Sydney | Adelaide | New Zealand
Komodo Content Management System. Link to website