Philips Ormonde Fitzpatrick logo
 
intellectual property    about us   our services   our professionals   news & publications   employment   contact us 
newsletter :: latest newsletter and form :: news :: lab notebook guide :: ip resources     search button
 
news and publications
:: news
small arrow terry collins dies
small arrow emdg scheme extended to cover ip
small arrow case review - nz opposition by hansen beverage
small arrow case review - opposition by nz post
small arrow change at ipopng
small arrow latest newsletter available
small arrow case review - ranbaxy appeal
small arrow new interactive map
small arrow new ip blog
small arrow top tier results in mip survey copy
small arrow case review - health world v shin-sun australia
small arrow mip global awards
small arrow uspto practice
small arrow case review - review australia v innovative lifestyle investments
small arrow brw triathlon success
small arrow case review - polo/lauren
small arrow po&f rating well in surveys
small arrow key ip treaties - global snapshot
small arrow case review - chiropedic bedding pty ltd v radburg pty ltd
small arrow case review - granting a licence to harvest trees may amount to contributory infringement of a patent
small arrow change to search results requirement
small arrow case review - termite tite v term-seal
small arrow case review - brothervdynamic
small arrow to amend or not to amend; that is the question
small arrow government to provide for experimental use
small arrow vale tony price
small arrow promotions
small arrow next big thing award winner announced
small arrow lockwood wins high court case
small arrow case review - burge v swarbrick
small arrow po&f client, labtech systems ltd, signs worldwide license agreement
small arrow hat trick for po&f in brw st george client choice awards
small arrow top tier results in mip survey
small arrow ip australia fees to change
small arrow new brand for phillips ormonde & fitzpatrick
small arrow physical effect of business methods

 


A new Designs Act for a new era - Phillips Ormonde & Fitzpatrick



A new Designs Act for a new era




17 June, 2004



Designers will have an easier and more effective way of protecting their industrial designs, with the new Designs Act 2003 coming into effect from today. “This is a new Designs Act for a new era,” Federal Industry Parliamentary Secretary Warren Entsch MP said in welcoming the new system. “The Designs Act 2003 replaces the Designs Act 1906, introducing a new system for industrial designs in Australia. This is the first major overhaul of the designs legislation in almost 100 years,” Mr Entsch said. “The old Act had reached the point where the Australian Government was concerned it no longer provided effective protection for designs, registrations were too easy to obtain, and the infringement of rights too difficult to prove.

The new Designs Act 2003 which comes into effect today will provide a more streamlined registration system, better enforcement and dispute resolution procedures, and stricter eligibility and infringement tests. “The Australian Government wants to give designers a much better chance of protecting their creations from copying, and changes to the Act which come in to force today will deliver that,” Mr Entsch said.

A design is the overall appearance of a product with one or more distinctive visual features. Visual features include shape, configuration, pattern and ornamentation of a product but not the feel of the product nor what the product is made from or how the product works.

IP Australia’s Deputy Registrar of Designs, Victor Portelli, said a significant change to the Act was that applicants would be given the choice of whether they wish to register or publish their design. “Other significant changes include clearer definitions, a reduced registration period from 16 years to 10 years and substantive examination will only occur after registration and only upon request,” Mr Portelli said. There are provisions for applications lodged before 17 June 2004 to be converted to the new Act. In these cases applications lodged under the old Act that have not been completed, will continue to be handled under the Designs Act 1906, unless the applicant chooses to 'convert' their application to an application under the new Act. Requests for conversion must be made before the old Act application is registered or the application lapses, is refused or withdrawn — whichever is first.

Mr Entsch said the improvements to the Act should considerably assist designers in obtaining design registration and in turn, allow greater protection. “I think it is fitting that we welcome in these significant changes, the first to the Designs Act in almost 100 years, in what is IP Australia’s centennial year.”

For further details on the new Act, visit the IP Australia website,
www.ipaustralia.gov.au.

The Act itself can be viewed in full at www.ipaustralia.gov.au/new_designs/index.shtml

Contact:

Greg Doolan
Office of Warren Entsch MP
t. 0418 213 243

Victor Portelli
IP Australia
t. (02) 6283 2093





 
copyright © Phillips Ormonde & Fitzpatrick 2006  I  Privacy Statement  I  Disclaimer  I  Sitemap Melbourne | Sydney | Adelaide | New Zealand
Komodo Content Management System. Link to website